Built for the 1961 → 2025 transition
Read the notice.
Cite the file.
Draft the reply.
Notice and assessment work for Indian practitioners — on one file per assessee, with the evidence attached and the sections named.
What comes back
You upload a 142(1). You get this.
Notice under section 142(1) for AY 2025-26, calling for accounts, documents and information in a scrutiny assessment.
- •Cash deposits aggregating ₹18,50,000
- •F&O turnover and applicability of tax audit under section 44AB
- •Source of investment in property of ₹42,00,000
- •Reconciliation of declared income with AIS and Form 26AS
Verify that a valid notice under section 143(2) was issued within the statutory time limit, failing which the scrutiny assessment is void ab initio.
Illustrative output on a specimen notice. Your notice, your figures.
Four steps, one file
The notice is read, not filed
The PDF is parsed on upload, and the deadline it carries drives your reminders. Scanned notices go through OCR first.
Analysis, with the sections named
The issues it actually raises, the sections engaged, what the department wants produced — and the limitation position, including whether a valid notice under section 143(2) went out in time.
The evidence sits on the same file
Bank statements, ledgers, confirmations — indexed, so the drafting can draw on them. A document that is not ready says so rather than being quietly skipped.
A reply built from what you selected
You pick the notice, the documents and the argument. The draft is assembled from those, and names what it drew on.
The same path, recorded
One scrutiny notice, start to finish: client, case, notice, analysis, supporting documents, reply. No edits to the output.
Also on the desk
Tax Reference Library
Acts, Rules, Circulars, Notifications, Instructions, Sections, Forms, FAQs, Tax Tutorials, Tax Treaties, Guidance Notes, Transfer Pricing material, Case Law and Reference Tables — searchable, and cited by the drafting.
Deep Research
A considered answer on a point of law with its sources shown, launched from the notice itself.
Document Research
Ask across the documents on a case: reconcile a figure, trace where an entry came from.
Act 1961 ↔ 2025
A section-by-section map, for the years when both statutes are live at once.
Your choice of engine
Gemini, GPT or Claude, picked per case rather than fixed by us. Claude and the deeper research modes draw on credits; the rest is in the plan.
It drafts. You sign.
Nothing is filed on your behalf. A notice must be analysed before it can be drafted against, documents must be indexed before they count, and every output names what it drew on — so your review is real rather than nominal. Treat it as a first pass by a junior, not a settled opinion.
Free trial, no card required. Every plan’s allowances are published at plan limits.